Can AI read, understand, and cite your site?
Not a vanity visibility %. A 20-point machine audit — crawler access, schema, answer-first copy, and page-level fixes. Benchmarked against 50 Toronto startups.
Why this exists
Visibility % tells you IF you showed up. We tell you IF you CAN show up — and how to fix it.
Most AI trackers sample answers to branded prompts and hand you a monthly percentage. That’s a lagging symptom. Stratezik runs machine checks on your site — the same gates AI crawlers hit before they ever cite you.
Monthly report
Typical AI visibility tracker
Symptom only — mentions, not mechanics
12%
AI visibility score
847 tracked prompts · Updated Feb 28
Share of voice (sample)
Bars show relative mentions — not tied to any page on your site.
“Your brand appeared in 12% of sampled answers, up 2 pts from last month.”
No URL, no schema detail, no robots.txt finding.
- ✗Can’t tell if PerplexityBot is blocked in robots.txt
- ✗Doesn’t know if your pricing page renders without JavaScript
- ✗No page-level fix list — just a trend line
Recommended action: Upgrade to see competitor breakdown →
Live scan output
Stratezik AEO Readiness Checker
Cause + fix — can AI read you, and what to change first
12.5 / 20
Toronto median 10.75 · Group A 95% · Group B 43%
Scored at scan time — not a monthly rollup
Critical · Crawler access
2 AI crawlers blocked in robots.txt — including PerplexityBot, Amazonbot. Those engines cannot index or cite your pages until you allow them.
Criterion · Group B
FAQPage schema
0/2 — no quotable Q&A for answer engines
Criterion · Group A
Raw HTML readability
Pass — content visible without JavaScript
/pricing
FAQPage schema missing
Add FAQPage JSON-LD; move tier comparison into a table AI can quote.
Evidence + full fix list unlock by email — Fix #1 is instant.
- ✓Probes GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot on your live site
- ✓20-point rubric split into defaults vs deliberate AEO work
- ✓Page URLs, schema blocks, and copy changes — not “create more content”
At a glance
Tracker vs checker — four differences
Typical tracker
Symptom · monthly
Stratezik checker
Cause + fix · live scan
The question
Typical tracker
“Did ChatGPT mention our brand this month?”
Stratezik
“Can GPTBot read our site, understand our entity, and quote our copy?”
What it checks
Typical tracker
Sampled AI answers to a curated prompt list
Stratezik
robots.txt, raw HTML, schema, llms.txt, answer-first structure — on your live pages
When you get it
Typical tracker
Monthly dashboard refresh
Stratezik
Topline in ~20s after you enter a URL; fixes by email
What you can do Monday
Typical tracker
“Publish more thought leadership” (maybe)
Stratezik
“Add FAQPage schema on /pricing — tiers are buried in prose”
Full sample report
Everything in one dashboard
Score, Group A/B split, crawler probe results, criteria bars, and page-level fixes — built from your URL after you scan.
Sample report
yourcompany.com
Demo brand only — enter your URL above to generate a live readiness report
Readiness score
12.5
/20 · median 10.75
Group A (defaults)
95%
7.1/7.5 pts
Group B (deliberate)
43%
5.4/12.5 pts
AI crawlers
6/8
Allowed in robots.txt
AEO score
Crawler access
Each row is a live probe — not a chart. Blocked bots cannot read your pages.
We request your homepage as each AI crawler. 6/8 can reach your site — 2 blocked in robots.txt, so those engines cannot index or cite you.
- GPTBot✓ Allowed
- ClaudeBot✓ Allowed
- Google-Extended✓ Allowed
- PerplexityBot✗ Blocked in robots.txt
- Bytespider✓ Allowed
- CCBot✓ Allowed
- Amazonbot✗ Blocked in robots.txt
- meta-external✓ Allowed
Criteria breakdown
vs competitors (email)
Fix #1 — sample
FAQPage schema missing
Add FAQPage JSON-LD; move tier comparison into a table AI can quote.
Fix #2 — email
Page-level fix
Add schema and answer-first blocks…
Fix #3 — email
Page-level fix
Add schema and answer-first blocks…
What to expect
Every section of your audit, explained
Sample visuals below — yours is personalized after the scan.
01 · Score
Your 20-point readiness score
Machine-verified across crawler access, schema, answer-first copy, entity clarity, and llms.txt — benchmarked against 50 funded Toronto startups.
Below median (10.75)
02 · Crawlers
Can AI bots read you at all?
We probe GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot, and others. A robots.txt block makes the rest of the audit moot.
We request your homepage as each AI crawler. 6/8 can reach your site — 2 blocked in robots.txt, so those engines cannot index or cite you.
- GPTBot✓ Allowed
- ClaudeBot✓ Allowed
- Google-Extended✓ Allowed
- PerplexityBot✗ Blocked in robots.txt
- Bytespider✓ Allowed
- CCBot✓ Allowed
- Amazonbot✗ Blocked in robots.txt
- meta-external✓ Allowed
03 · Criteria
Group A defaults vs Group B deliberate
Group A catches baseline gaps most sites miss. Group B scores intentional AEO — FAQ schema, answer-first headings, information gain.
04 · Competitors
Head-to-head on the same rubric
Name rivals after email unlock and see who wins on the same 20-point test — not a vanity visibility percentage.
05 · Fixes
Page-level fix list
Specific URLs, schema blocks, and copy changes — not “improve your content.” Fix depth unlocks by email; topline is instant.
/pricing
FAQPage schema missing
Add FAQPage JSON-LD; move tier comparison into a table AI can quote.
Sneak peek
Click through the report sections
Overview, crawlers, criteria, competitors, and fixes — same structure after your scan.
12.5 / 20
Toronto median 10.75
Scoring model
Twenty points, two groups
Group A = defaults. Group B = deliberate answer-engine work.
Crawler access
CriticalGPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot
Raw HTML
Group AContent visible without JavaScript execution
Organization schema
Group AEntity clarity for knowledge graphs
FAQPage schema
Group BQuotable Q&A for answer engines
Answer-first copy
Group BDeclarative opening sentences AI can cite
llms.txt
Group BMachine-readable site map for LLM crawlers
What you unlock
Free score → email breakdown → optional AI report
Instant
Free
- ✓Score out of 20
- ✓Group A vs B split
- ✓Crawler block alert
- ✓Toronto benchmark
Full breakdown
Free · email
- ✓All criteria + evidence
- ✓Per-criterion fixes
- ✓Competitor comparison
- ✓Report in inbox
AI visibility
$10
- ✓5 live AI query tests
- ✓Page citability scores
- ✓Competitor AI visibility
- ✓PDF by email
Ready to see if AI can cite you?
Generate your report — or try our Local Visibility Scan.
FAQ
AEO readiness checker: common questions
- What is an AEO readiness test?
- An AEO (answer engine optimisation) readiness test scores how well your website can be read, understood, and cited by AI assistants and answer engines. Stratezik’s free checker runs eight machine-verified criteria across crawler access, server-rendered HTML, entity presence, Organization and FAQ schema, answer-first copy, llms.txt, and pricing transparency, scaled to a score out of 20.
- Is the Stratezik AEO checker free?
- Yes. Enter your URL to get a topline score and defaults-vs-deliberate split in about 20 seconds with no signup. Enter your email (with consent) to unlock the full eight-criterion breakdown, evidence, and prioritized fix list on screen and by email. Paid options ($10 page report, $49 full-site audit) add AI-visibility queries, competitor benchmarks, and page-level GEO diagnostics.
- What is a good AEO readiness score?
- In Stratezik’s June 2026 audit of 50 funded Toronto startup websites, the median score was 10.75 out of 20 and no company scored above 17. Startups averaged 95% on “default” criteria (crawler access, rendering, presence) but only 29% on deliberate work (schema, copy structure, llms.txt, machine-readable pricing). Beating the median is a start; closing the deliberate gap is where most AI visibility wins live.
- How is this different from AI visibility tracking tools?
- Most AI visibility trackers report whether you were mentioned in an AI answer (a symptom). Stratezik’s checker tests whether your site is technically and structurally ready to be cited (the cause): raw HTML visibility, schema, chunk-friendly headings, trust markers, and information gain. You get specific fixes, not just a percentage.
- What does the 20-point test check?
- Eight criteria, each worth 2.5 points: AI crawler access (robots.txt), JavaScript-free rendering, off-page entity alignment (LinkedIn/Crunchbase), Organization schema, FAQPage schema, answer-first formatting, llms.txt, and pricing transparency. Group A covers what your stack gives you by default; Group B is what you must build deliberately.
- What is ChatGPT Search readiness?
- A separate gate on every free scan. ChatGPT Search and Copilot need OAI-SearchBot to reach your homepage and your site to be indexed for search. The checker probes OAI-SearchBot access and runs a site: indexation check, then points you to Bing Webmaster Tools for the Bing-specific confirmation ChatGPT Search still depends on.
- Who built this AEO checker?
- Stratezik Digital, a Toronto digital marketing agency specializing in SEO, AEO, paid media, and growth strategy for startups and SMBs across Canada. The test is the same machine-verified framework published in the Toronto Startup Website Audit 2026 research report.
Research behind the benchmark: Toronto Startup Website Audit 2026. Need help implementing fixes? Book a call.